Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric
Area of Assessment 100-90 (A) 89-80 (B) 79-70 (C) 69-60 (D) 59-below (F)
Process Work 15 pts. 90% - 100% of process work is complete. 80% - 89% of process work is complete. 70% - 79% of process work is complete. 60% - 69% of process work is complete. Most process work is missing.
Quantity and Evaluation of Sources 20 pts. Contains seven sources; two are scholarly. All sources cited are evaluated for quality using the CRAAP test. Contains seven sources; two are scholarly. Most sources cited are evaluated for quality using the CRAAP test. May be missing a source, or does not have two scholarly sources. Some sources cited are evaluated for quality using the CRAAP test. Missing required sources or few sources cited are evaluated for quality using the CRAAP test. Document is three sources under the required number of sources, and there is little or no reliable evaluation of sources.
Content and Organization 20pts. Annotations clearly contain concise summaries, evaluations, and reflections. The organization is clear. Sentences are well developed and they progress logically from what precedes them. Annotations clearly contain summaries, evaluations, and reflections.The order of information is logical, and the reader can follow it because of well-chosen transitions. Some annotations may be missing components. May exhibit minor imperfections or inconsistencies in development and organization. Annotations are missing some components. Organization is difficult to see or infer. Ideas may not be coherently developed or arranged; transitions are missing or flawed. Annotations lack summaries, evaluations, or reflections. Plagued by more than one of the organizational deficiencies of a D bibliography.
Written fluency of annotations 25 pts. All annotations are thoughtful, complete, and well written. Most annotations are thoughtful, complete, and well written. Some annotations are well written but some are lacking in completeness, thought, and /or writing quality. Most annotations are lacking in completeness, thought, and/or writing quality. All annotations are lacking in completeness, thought, and/or writing quality.
Mechanics 20 pts. The annotations may contain a few surface errors, but they do not seriously undermine the overall effectiveness of the paragraphs. The annotations are clear and readable. Few sentence-level errors (comma splices, fragments, or fused sentences) appear. The writing is generally free of sentence-level errors; word choice is correct though limited. The annotations contain some errors in spelling, usage, and punctuation. Writing may have numerous and consistent errors in spelling, usage, and punctuation that reveal unfamiliarity with the conventions of Standard Edited English (or a lack of careful proofreading). Numerous and consistent errors of spelling, usage, and punctuation hinder communication.

Process Work for the Annotated Bibs

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License