Annotated Bibliography Peer Review Alex T

Do you think I need to add more for my second paragraphs? My first source I wrote about the CRAAP test but I felt like it was too long.

  • I think the first source has enough information from the CRAAP test…but the second and third could maybe use a bit more. nw

Are the summaries detailed enough that you understand what the source is all about? Are there details that the writer included that are unnecessary to the summary? What questions are you left with after reading the summaries?

  • I like how you start out with what the source is about for each one. It helps to have a general idea within the first couple of sentences so that you can better understand the rest of the paragraph. nw

Did the reviewer evaluate the sources using the CRAAP test? Do you see criteria based judgements about each letter (currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, purpose)? What is missing?

  • The first paragraph is very detailed using the CRAAP test, but the second and third sources could use more information from the CRAAP test. nw

Are the reflection sections complete enough that you understand how the writer responded to the sources? Could they include more information?

  • It seems that you understand your sources so that's why your third paragraphs are shorter. But maybe for other readers you could include more information. nw

Based on these three entries, in what direction do you think the writer's research is going?

  • I think you have a good start on finding good, credible sources for your topic. I think you're heading in the right direction! nw

What questions are you left with after reading these entries?

  • I don't have any questions. Its easy to understand for me. nw

What are these annotations weaknesses?

  • CRAAP test paragraphs; but maybe you understand that they do/don't work so you don't need to completely go through the test. nw

What are these annotations strengths?

  • The summary paragraphs and the amount of details they include. nw

Paris' Peer Review

Are the summaries detailed enough that you understand what the source is all about? Are there details that the writer included that are unnecessary to the summary? What questions are you left with after reading the summaries?

Your summaries are very good and cover mostly what the articles are about. I didn't have any questions after the summaries.

Did the reviewer evaluate the sources using the CRAAP test? Do you see criteria based judgements about each letter (currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, purpose)? What is missing?

Yes you used the CRAAP test but you could elaborate a little more on the second and third ones just to clarify if it was a legitimate source or not.

Are the reflection sections complete enough that you understand how the writer responded to the sources? Could they include more information?

I think the reflections are good and give your main opinion of the articles but again you could add just a little more to it.

Based on these three entries, in what direction do you think the writer's research is going?

You are going in the direction that piracy is dangerous for everyone.

What questions are you left with after reading these entries?

What is the other side of the argument that says that piracy could possibly be good?

What are these annotations weaknesses?

The only weaknesses I found was the short paragraphs but you still got your point across.

What are these annotations strengths?

The strengths are that you found sources that agree with your opinion and can back up your claims in your paper.

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License