Annotated Bibliography Peer Review Berkelman
  • Are my summaries thorough enough?

claire - Yosh they are totes good. Seriously though, you aren't overly detailed and you are not too broad. The summaries summarize quite nicely. Though there are a few grammar mistakes. You may wish to reread some of them for example in your second source last paragraph you wrote, "I will defiantly use this source in my research." I do believe you mean definitely.
Luke- Yes it seemed thorough.

  • Did I apply the CRAAP test properly?

claire - I can tell you were answering questions from the CRAAP test so yes.
Luke-Yes it looked good.

Are the summaries detailed enough that you understand what the source is all about? Are there details that the writer included that are unnecessary to the summary? What questions are you left with after reading the summaries?

claire - Yes the summaries are detailed enough to paint a accurate picture of the article. I don't see any "fluff" in the summaries. All of it is necessary. No questions.
~The summaries convey the message of each article pretty well. I wasn't left with any questions and there didn't seem to be any unnecessary. Jake
Luke- The summries seems pretty solid, and on point. I didnt have any questions.

Did the reviewer evaluate the sources using the CRAAP test? Do you see criteria based judgements about each letter (currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, purpose)? What is missing?

claire - Yes they used the CRAAP test.
~I don't see anything missing from the CRAAP test, everything seems to be there. Jake
Luke- Yes the CRAPP test was used.

Are the reflection sections complete enough that you understand how the writer responded to the sources? Could they include more information?

claire- Yes they clearly stated her intentions for the article.
~The reflections seem complete. You seem to have an idea whether or not you will use the source in your paper. Jake
Luke- I think the reflections were done well! Maybe a little more information, but a little more info never hurt nobody.

Based on these three entries, in what direction do you think the writer's research is going?

claire - You got this!
~Based on the annotations, your research seems to be going well and headed in the right direction. Jake
Luke-your research seems to be going well!

What questions are you left with after reading these entries?

claire - No questions.
~I don't have any questions after reading these annotations. Jake
Luke- None!

What are these annotations weaknesses?

claire - ↓↓ What I was going to say ↓↓
~I believe there was one spelling error in the reflection paragraph of the second annotation, I'm assuming you mean "definitely" instead of "defiantly." That is the only problem I found. Jake
Luke- A few grammar errors.

What are these annotations strengths?

claire - Very thorough.
~Thorough summaries and CRAAP tests. Jake
~Found a way to pack all the information into the annotations efficiently. Jake
Luke- The summaries were done well!

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License