Annotated Bibliography Peer Review Lb

Is my information too repetitive?
I didn't find it repetitive. - Dylan
No -Anna

Did i type enough for each paragraph?
I would maybe add some more to the summaries for the last two. - Dylan
Your summaries and evaluation paragraphs need a little more. - Anna

Are the summaries detailed enough that you understand what the source is all about? Are there details that the writer included that are unnecessary to the summary? What questions are you left with after reading the summaries?

I got a feel for what each article was about, but maybe a little more wouldn't hurt. - Dylan
They could use a little more information, they are a little too short. -Anna

Did the reviewer evaluate the sources using the CRAAP test? Do you see criteria based judgements about each letter (currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, purpose)? What is missing?

You covered it all - Dylan
Your CRAAP paragraphs look good! Anna

Are the reflection sections complete enough that you understand how the writer responded to the sources? Could they include more information?

All of them seem to be viable for his argument. - Dyaln
Yes, he clearly explains why the source will help him in his writing. -Anna

Based on these three entries, in what direction do you think the writer's research is going?

Trying to better understand the risk and benefits of taking performance enhancing drugs. - Dylan
Looking at risks and benefits of difference sport enhancing drugs -Anna

What questions are you left with after reading these entries?

None - Dylan
None- Anna

What are these annotations weaknesses?

Short summaries. - Dylan
Summaries, everything else looks good. -Anna

What are these annotations strengths?

Good CRAAP test for all of them. - Dylan
Good sources, and seems like good information. -Anna

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License