Annotated Bibliography Peer Review Lm

Are the summaries detailed enough that you understand what the source is all about?

• Yes KM
• Yes Taylor Kramer

Are there details that the writer included that are unnecessary to the summary?

• No KM
• No Taylor Kramer

What questions are you left with after reading the summaries?

• None KM
• I don't have any questions Taylor Kramer

Did the reviewer evaluate the sources using the CRAAP test?

Do you see criteria based judgements about each letter (currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, purpose)? What is missing?

• There was nothing missing for the CRAAP test. She did a good job. KM
• The CRAAP test has nothing missing Taylor Kramer

Are the reflection sections complete enough that you understand how the writer responded to the sources? Could they include more information?

• It was very clear how you felt about the subject and how the article itself affected you KM
• You did well on the reflection Taylor Kramer

Based on these three entries, in what direction do you think the writer's research is going?

• I think it shows that she is very much against animal captivity KM
• You care a lot about animals in captivity Taylor Kramer

What questions are you left with after reading these entries?

• None, she did a great job at picking some very interesting articles KM
• I don't have any questions Taylor Kramer

What are these annotations weaknesses?

• I honestly don't see any weaknesses. She has completed all 7 annotations and has done a great job on each KM
• I don't see any weakness Taylor Kramer

What are these annotations strengths?

• I like how your reflections explained how much you really care about the subject. KM
• I agree. ^^ Your reflections show how you care about the subject Taylor Kramer