Annotated Bibliography Peer Review Paris

Are the summaries detailed enough that you understand what the source is all about? Are there details that the writer included that are unnecessary to the summary? What questions are you left with after reading the summaries?

Alex Your summaries are very detailed and I can easily understand what the article must be about, I don't see any unnecessary details, I am left with no questions

Did the reviewer evaluate the sources using the CRAAP test? Do you see criteria based judgements about each letter (currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, purpose)? What is missing?

Alex Your second paragraphs went over the CRAAP test rather well, they were very detailed.

Are the reflection sections complete enough that you understand how the writer responded to the sources? Could they include more information?

Alex Your reflection paragraphs don't have anything missing that I can see, they get straight to the point.

Based on these three entries, in what direction do you think the writer's research is going?

Alex I can tell that you are trying to tell about the dangers of synthetic drugs and why they're bad.

What questions are you left with after reading these entries?

Alex I am left with no questions.

What are these annotations weaknesses?

Alex I see no weaknesses.

What are these annotations strengths?

Alex The amount of detail really strengthens your bibliography.

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License