Annotated Bibliography Peer Review Tj

I'm not sure if I am putting to much information into the summary about the sources.

I don't think there is too much information in the summary. -Taylor Kramer

Are the summaries detailed enough that you understand what the source is all about? Are there details that the writer included that are unnecessary to the summary? What questions are you left with after reading the summaries?

Did the reviewer evaluate the sources using the CRAAP test? Do you see criteria based judgements about each letter (currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, purpose)? What is missing?

Are the reflection sections complete enough that you understand how the writer responded to the sources? Could they include more information?

Based on these three entries, in what direction do you think the writer's research is going?

What questions are you left with after reading these entries?

What are these annotations weaknesses?

What are these annotations strengths?

I think the summaries are detailed enough to understand what they source is about. I think you answered the questions in the CRAAP test for each source. I think maybe you could add a little more to the reflection. I think you are figuring out the direction of your writing with these three sources. I didn't notice any weaknesses besides that the reflection may need a little more information, but the summary is very strong. -Taylor Kramer

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License