Annotated Peer Reviews K Wong

Questions for viewrs:

• Are the flow of my paragraphs consequently understandable?
• Do I bring out my main concern/view?
• Grammar and prose/awkward sentences is a big error I tend to make (if you notice any can you tell me how I can possibly fix it?)

Are the summaries detailed enough that you understand what the source is all about? Are there details that the writer included that are unnecessary to the summary? What questions are you left with after reading the summaries?

Did the reviewer evaluate the sources using the CRAAP test? Do you see criteria based judgements about each letter (currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, purpose)? What is missing?

Are the reflection sections complete enough that you understand how the writer responded to the sources? Could they include more information?

Based on these three entries, in what direction do you think the writer's research is going?

What questions are you left with after reading these entries?

What are these annotations weaknesses?

What are these annotations strengths?