Peer Review Kt

Peer Review

Writers

In regards to this writing assignment, what are you most worried about?

Im worried that I may have missed some information. Also I'm not sure how well my writing flows.

Reba Peterson

First, help the writer with their stated concerns ^
- I think it flowed really well and maybe if you feel like you've missed information you could make more adjustments.
- I thought it flowed really well and from what I saw you were missing the context. ML
How well can you follow the writer's line of reasoning? Are there any places where you got a little lost, or things seemed less clear?
- Good flow and I understood it completely. - Dylan
- I followed the line of reasoning really well. ML
Does the writer address the rhetorical situation sufficiently (purpose, audience, author, genre, and context)? If not, where do you think they need to add or clarify information?
- all good
- You never mentioned the context (when and where) and genre of the article. - Dylan
- Don't think I saw the context either. *ML**
Does the writer identify the:
- catalyst: no
- main claim (thesis): yes Yes to all ML
- supports: yes
- linkages: yes
- implications: yes

Does the writer give evidence from the article to back up their analysis?
- yes
- Yes a lot of evidence throughout your writing. ML
Finally, write a few sentences describing your reactions to the text as you were reading it.
- You incorporated quotes from the article very well. I like that you showed the good and bad points in his article.
- Overall I thought it was good, but I would go back and look up the things I mentioned earlier. Very solid one why you think Carr has unsatisfied claims. - Dylan
- I thought your writing was good and all of your information was well incorporated. ML