Peer Review Kt

Peer Review


In regards to this writing assignment, what are you most worried about?

  • Im worried that I may have missed some information. Also I'm not sure how well my writing flows.


Reba Peterson

  • First, help the writer with their stated concerns ^
    • I think it flowed really well and maybe if you feel like you've missed information you could make more adjustments.
    • I thought it flowed really well and from what I saw you were missing the context. ML
  • How well can you follow the writer's line of reasoning? Are there any places where you got a little lost, or things seemed less clear?
    • Good flow and I understood it completely. - Dylan
    • I followed the line of reasoning really well. ML
  • Does the writer address the rhetorical situation sufficiently (purpose, audience, author, genre, and context)? If not, where do you think they need to add or clarify information?
    • all good
    • You never mentioned the context (when and where) and genre of the article. - Dylan
    • Don't think I saw the context either. *ML**
  • Does the writer identify the:
    • catalyst: no
    • main claim (thesis): yes Yes to all ML
    • supports: yes
    • linkages: yes
    • implications: yes
  • Does the writer give evidence from the article to back up their analysis?
    • yes
    • Yes a lot of evidence throughout your writing. ML
  • Finally, write a few sentences describing your reactions to the text as you were reading it.
    • You incorporated quotes from the article very well. I like that you showed the good and bad points in his article.
    • Overall I thought it was good, but I would go back and look up the things I mentioned earlier. Very solid one why you think Carr has unsatisfied claims. - Dylan
    • I thought your writing was good and all of your information was well incorporated. ML
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License