Proposal Essay Responses K Wong

Explain how Edmondson responds to opposing points of view. Describe specific passages in which she counters those or concedes and refutes them.

Edmondson brings a more psychological aspect that draws readers in. It allows the reader to experience why big box stores are taking away such communication between the towns people and the towns stores. The heart of the town disappears as more convenient stores and companies breach creating their territory. Edmonson brings values to her point of view to go against those what are fond with the cheap, affordable companies (Walmart, Meijers). Even though theses big box stores bring variety they do not add to the town. The big box stores are created for business not for the local community. Edmondson cites "where the values and needs of the local community carry little or no weight," according to Stacy Mitchell of News Project in Minneapolis. (qtd. in "New" 25).Edmondson starts strong by introducing the harmful effects of chain stores. The big box stores are providing promising jobs and price-lowering competition which quickly shut down the downtown shops according to Edmondson (pg. 259 pp.3). Instead of going to many different shops there is one shop that basically has it all. The experience and history of downtown stores soon cease to exist. Edmonson counterargues that local businesses cannot compete with the low prices available to larger corporations and many are sent to shut down their stores. Instead of a promise for the well being of the community the chain stores drain the townspeople money.

Identify her main claim and at least three supporting claims. For each of these claims, describe one piece of support she has that is linked to each claim.

Her main claim is that there is the loss of culture in small towns who rely on big box stores. She claims that the most disturbing factor is that there is a sense of personal deterioration of individuals occurring in communities today. Edmondson uses Benlow to explain the harmful effects of consumerism. People no longer see themselves as a part of the community and instead engross themselves in selfish desires. She inserts a citation from Benslow explaining that consumerism and corporations create a deteriorating communities where the citizens are the ones who determine the end result of where this "destruction" will lead.

Edmondson uses sources throughout her argument. Which ones are the most effective? Why?

Her personal was most effective of the way she describes the situation from her view. It has a persuading effect. She was able to provide a positive examples of what can be done to fix this crisis. Edmondson brings up the ongoing fight with the community against theses big box stores. She concludes that not only do citizens must stand up to the stores, they must reject the big box stores that threaten their community and economy.

P1 Intro to author and story

P2 Description of Scottville

P3 Impact of small community on citizens

P4 Description of Cadillac and how big companies have changed the town

P5 Opposing view of variety available knocked-down

P6 Knock-down economic gain proposed by large corporations

P7 Knock-down cheaper prices provided by large corporations

P8 Support by sources and Maslow’s hierarchy of needs

P9 Lose bonds within communities

P10 Personable example

P11 Assault on independence argument

P12 Middle-ground, corporations aren’t always bad

P13 Middle-ground continued, discussing quality of goods

P14 Downtown shops offer more to workers than Walmart does

P15 Next generation consumerism

P16 Walmart hiring illegal immigrants

P17 Citizens starting to stand up to big corporations, seemingly; belonging

P18 TACCI - local currency in towns

P19 We need to do this; conclusion

What Edmondson is Missing:
Not much of a counterargument for solutions.
She mentions and dwells more on one corporation.
Only establishes the problem not providing more of a solution a community can do.
Does not bring opposing views in solutions

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License