Rhetorical Analysis Nw

Rhetorical Analysis of, "Is Google Making Us Stupid?"

Do you often find yourself reading, but not being able to recall what you've just read? Or maybe catch yourself skimming a piece of reading instead of understanding it completely? In the article, "Is Google Making Us Stupid", the author, Nicholas Carr, has a few key things he attempts to address in the first two paragraphs. Carr's audience that he is trying to reach consists of mainly anyone who uses the internet on a regular basis. People such as young people who may have a sense of withdrawals from electronics and internet access when they no longer become available, and people who used to be avid readers with actual books and who have now turned to electronic books for convenience. Carr's purpose seems to be a warning for his audience. A warning about how being on the internet for prolonged periods of time, adding up to many years, can result in what he claims as a sort of brain loss. He quotes in his article, "concentration often starts to drift…lose the thread…looking for something else to do…dragging my wayward brain back." This article very much so falls into the editorial category. An editorial genre focuses on a controversy of public concern. The context of the article is easy for the majority of the population to understand. Most everyone has used some sort of technology to access the internet. With the exception of the elderly.

Carr identifies his catalyst in the beginning of his article by stating that he feels as though that someone is tinkering and messing with his brain. Being unconscious to the situation of the internet being the so called cause of this, he goes on explaining how he feels at a loss of brain capacity, with the inability to continue with his reading as he did years before. Carr makes a central claim that Google is making us this way. Stupid, in his words. He states that instead of someone having to physically go to a library to find an answer and do actual research, we can now just sit down and have the idea of a library at our fingertips. The ability to type in one question, and have a simple answer appear on our screen. Practically no reading involved. He supports his article by consulting with professionals. He uses the research these scholars have conducted and quotes it directly in his article. He does use information and ideas provided by people who are regular bloggers. He uses Maryanne Wolf, a developmental psychologist, as a source for his writings. She says, "We are not only what we read, we are how we read." He links this research back to the fact that we can't read the way we used to be able to read, or so he claims. Carr's implications may get some of the population to go against what he is trying to get across. Many young individuals will not agree with his claims about how screen time and internet use is making our reading abilities diminish. This is a controversial topic that Nicholas Carr discusses.

This article offers many open ideas of why our ways of reading have diminished and redeveloped over the last 50 years. Nicholas Carr uses some credible sources for his writings, but there is room for more research to be done. His concluding paragraph is maybe the most important paragraph that Carr constructs throughout the whole article. The paragraph states, "As we are drained of our "inner repertory of dense cultural inheritance." We risk turning into "pancake people" spread wide and thin as we connect with that vast network of information accessed by the mere touch of a button." This sentence is enough to make people have the desire to think twice about how they find an answer, or how much time they spend on the internet. While it won't convince every single person, it might give a good majority of the population a second guess on how they spend their free time.

Rhetorical Analysis Peer Review NW

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License