Rhetorical Analysis Peer Review Lb

Writers

I'm most worried about if i understood the information and questions given to me, I felt like the questions were vague and kind of repetitive. But i feel like i just didn't some of the questions and felt like my writing could have been a little rushed and choppy.

Reviewers

  • First, help the writer with their stated concerns ^

Claire: The questions were a little repetitive but I feel like you did a good job of answering them. It doesn't seem too choppy and I believe everyone rushed it. Including myself.
Lauren: I feel the same way. The questions were difficult to understand and i was unsure as to whether I was answering them correctly.

  • How well can you follow the writer's line of reasoning? Are there any places where you got a little lost, or things seemed less clear?

Claire: Most of your writing is pretty straight forward and it is grouped together nicely.
Lauren: The majority of Luke's writing is put together nicely and flows well.

  • Does the writer address the rhetorical situation sufficiently (purpose, audience, author, genre, and context)? If not, where do you think they need to add or clarify information?

Claire: Yes it hits all the points.
Lauren: yes

  • Does the writer identify the:
    • catalyst
    • main claim (thesis)
    • supports
    • linkages
    • implications
  • Does the writer give evidence from the article to back up their analysis?

Claire: I feel like you could add a little more but, overall you did a good job.
Lauren: Maybe you were a little to vague when you came to answering the questions but other then that you did a good job.

  • Finally, write a few sentences describing your reactions to the text as you were reading it.

Claire: It is a really nice read and it seemed to hit all the main points.
Lauren: I agreed with what Luke had to say and thought that he had some good points in his writing.

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License